ArticleBlood advances2025
Polatuzumab vedotin in CNS lymphoma: proof-of-concept study for blood-brain barrier penetration.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in molecular pathobiology of PCNSL - towards clinical implementation of novel diagnostics and therapeutics.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- [The efficacy and safety of glofitamab combined with polatuzumab vedotin in the treatment of 9 cases of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after failing CAR-T cell therapy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPolatuzumab vedotin (pola) is a CD79B-targeting antibody-drug conjugate with significant clinical activity in systemic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, the ability of pola to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and induce responses in central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (CNSL) is unknown. Since other antibody-based therapies can partially penetrate the BBB to induce clinical responses in CNSL and other CNS malignancies, we hypothesized that pola would also partially penetrate the BBB, which could support its evaluation in future CNSL clinical trials. To test this hypothesis, we first evaluated the preclinical efficacy of pola in primary and secondary CNSL xenografts, where we observed that pola significantly decreased CNS tumor burden and prolonged survival in mice. To extend these findings, we compiled a clinical case series of 3 patients with CNSL treated with pola-based treatment. Here, on-treatment cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples revealed pola CSF drug concentrations exceeding its established 50% inhibitory concentration, with CSF drug levels being 0.56% to 1.31% of those in plasma. Interestingly, 2 of the 3 patients with CNSL achieved a complete response to pola-based treatment. In summary, these data indicate pola is effective against preclinical CNSL models and can partially penetrate the BBB in patients with CNSL, which together provide support for the evaluation of pola-based treatment in future clinical trials of primary and secondary CNSL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.