ArticlePloS one2025
Structural and functional analysis of Escherichia coli membrane disruption by Ib-M peptides.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ib-M1 Antimicrobial Peptide Alters Membrane Permeability and DisruptsMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial activity and toxicological evaluation of didecyldimethyl-ammonium chloride complexed with fatty alcohol ethoxylate.Veterinary world · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance represents a critical global public health challenge, leading to increased mortality and morbidity due to the ineffectiveness of current antibiotics against bacterial infections. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) offer a promising alternative for treating bacterial infections because of their broad-spectrum activity, biocompatibility, and rapid bactericidal action. Recent studies have demonstrated that Ib-M peptides exhibit bactericidal activity against pathogenic Escherichia coli clinical isolates. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms by which Ib-M peptides destabilize and disrupts E. coli membranes. We showed by dilutions assays that Ib-M peptides had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 12.5 µM against E. coli. Electron microscopy studies confirmed that Ib-M peptides were directly implicated in E. coli membrane disruption, altered bacterial shape and subsequent disintegration. To understand bacterial membrane interaction with Ib-M peptides at the molecular level, we evaluated structure-function relationships using circular dichroism spectroscopy and in silico simulations. These studies demonstrated the strong amphipathic, hydrophobic and cationic properties of Ib-M peptides. At sublethal concentrations, these peptides interacted with bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS), leading to outer and inner membrane permeation and cytoplasmic membrane depolarization. This effect was transient at sublethal Ib-M peptides concentrations, as evidenced by the recovery of bacterial growth in lag phase kinetics. At higher concentrations, there was high depolarization of cytoplasmic membrane, disruption of outer membrane and inner membranes and irreversible bacterial lysis. When mammalian cells were exposed Ib-M1 peptide cytotoxic effect was only reached when MIC was increased 10-fold. In conclusion, Ib-M peptides inhibited E. coli growth by disrupting bacterial membranes via interactions with LPS and increased membrane permeation yet, they have low cytotoxicity on mammalian cells. This study highlights the mechanisms of action on Ib-M peptides as antimicrobials and paves the way for further research on the clinical use of these peptides as antimicrobial agents against multidrug resistant bacterial infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.