Trial reportPloS one2025
Emergence agitation in pediatrics after dexmedetomidine vs. sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between intranasal dexmedetomidine dose and delayed awakening after sedation in children: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of general anaesthesia with and without dexmedetomidine in emergence agitation.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergence agitation remains a problem that occurs in pediatric anesthesia. As cleft surgeries constitute one of the most common craniofacial surgeries encountered, majority of the children receive general anesthesia using high dose opioids and inhalation anesthetics and experience emergence agitation. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an alpha-2 adrenoreceptor agonist possesses anxiolytic, sedative and analgetic properties and have been documented to reduce the incidence of postoperative agitation. Hence, this study aims to compare the incidence of emergence agitation between the use of intravenous DEX versus Sevoflurane (SEVO) anesthesia.
methodsThis study selected one hundred twenty-one patients ages 3 months to 10 years with ASA 1 and 2 physical status scheduled to undergo elective cleft lip or cleft palate repair with general anesthesia. Before surgery, all patients were assessed preoperatively and subjects were divided into two groups using a computer-generated randomizer with 59 subjects selected as Dexmedetomidine group; and 62 subjects as Sevoflurane group. Extubation time, recovery time and emergence agitation scale were compared between the two groups.
resultsThis study found no significant difference in the extubation time between DEX and SEVO group (p = 0.317). The recovery time or time to attain full consciousness was statistically longer in the DEX group: 60 minutes as compared to 52 minutes in the SEVO group (p = 0.007). Emergence agitation assessed using Cravero score found that subjects from DEX group had an average Cravero score of 2.5; while SEVO group had an average Cravero score of 3.9 (p = < 0.001). The incidence of agitation was significantly higher in the SEVO group compared to the DEX group: 82% as compared to 10% (p = < 0.001) with an OR of 40.955 CI 95% (14.098-118.9).
conclusionsDexmedetomidine significantly reduces the incidence of emergence agitation without prolonging extubation time in pediatric patients undergoing cleft lip and cleft palate surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.