ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning-based forecasting of air quality index under long-term environmental patterns: A comparative approach with XGBoost, LightGBM, and SVM.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Graph-Centrality Context for Station-Level Correction of CAMS Air Quality Reanalysis in Lombardy from 2018 to 2021.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DynamicSeq2SeqXGB for PM2.5 imputation in extremely sparse environmental monitoring networks.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Air pollution is a global problem that threatens environmental sustainability and severely affects public health. Monitoring air quality and predicting future pollution levels are critical for creating effective environmental policies and enabling individuals to take precautions against air pollution. This study presents a long-term assessment of daily Air Quality Index (AQI) prediction using machine learning models based on meteorological and pollutant data collected in eastern Türkiye from 2016 to 2024. The dataset includes four major air pollutants (PM₁₀, SO₂, NO₂, O₃) and five meteorological variables (temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, wind direction, wind speed). Three models-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) as performance metrics. Among these, XGBoost achieved the highest prediction accuracy (R² = 0.999, RMSE = 0.234, MAE = 0.158). The results demonstrate that ensemble-based machine learning approaches, particularly XGBoost, can effectively model AQI fluctuations using environmental predictors. These results provide valuable insights for air quality forecasting systems and suggest practical implications for regional air pollution management and early warning systems, supporting public health protection and the development of environmental health policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.