Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060963›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Outcomes and costs in specialized burn care: Adapting the Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model for burn care.

Raaba S M Thambithurai, Willem H P van Veghel, Denise van Uden, Jean-Bart Bügel, Anouk Pijpe, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Margriet E van Baar, Angelique E A M Weel-Koenders, National Burn Care, Education & Research group, the Netherlands

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raaba S M ThambithuraiAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-7328
Willem H P van VeghelDepartment of Finance and Control, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Denise van UdenAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jean-Bart BügelDepartment of Finance and Control, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Anouk PijpeAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Marianne K NieuwenhuisAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis H van der VliesAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Margriet E van BaarAlliance of Dutch Burn Care (ADBC), Burn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-7375
Angelique E A M Weel-KoendersErasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
National Burn Care, Education & Research group, the Netherlands

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Quality Cost Indicator (QCI) model supports value-based health care at the institutional level, by calculating disease-specific health outcomes per unit cost over time. The aim of this study was to adapt the QCI model for specialized burn care (the BC-QCI model) and explore its utilization using real-world data. Burn care outcome indicators were selected through an iterative process with multiple stakeholders. Threshold values were established per outcome indicator and average total healthcare costs were calculated. A cohort of adult burn patients (n = 1449) admitted for at least one day and/or had undergone surgery in Dutch burn centers between 2020 and 2023 was used, with a follow-up period of 12 months. The proportion of patients who achieved textbook outcome (i.e., having achieved all the outcome indicators), the average total costs per patient, and QCI values were calculated. Of all patients, 54% achieved all five outcome indicators (i.e., length of stay, wound infections, other complications, discharge destination, and predicted mortality). The most successful outcome indicator was 'predicted mortality' (passed by 99% of the population), the least successful outcome indicator was 'length of stay' (62%). The patients who failed to achieve one or more outcome indicators (46%) had significantly higher average total costs compared to the patients who achieved textbook outcome (54%) (€50,134 [€47,810-€52,850] vs. €11,721 [€11,096-€12,429]). The BC-QCI model is a solid foundation to provide insights into the outcomes and costs for specialized burn care at the institutional level.

Indexed as

BurnsHealth Care CostsQuality Indicators, Health CareAdultAgedBurn UnitsFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID41060963
PMCPMC12507314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.