ArticlePloS one2025
Consumer willingness-to-pay for blockchain-based QR code traceability of leafy greens.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding Organic Food Purchase Intention and Adoption in Türkiye: The Roles of Health, Sustainability, Product Information, and Social Media.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Blockchain-enabled strategic optimization: A decision analytics framework for multinational enterprises' e-commerce entry model.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is continued interest in the modernization of food traceability systems because of increased consumer consciousness of food production, processing, and transportation and the desire of the food industry to identify and contain sources of foodborne illness outbreaks and improve their reputations to consumers. Blockchain-based traceability systems promise faster access to more decentralized, tamper-proof records of the movement of a food product and its ingredients through the supply chain. Using data from two discrete choice experiment surveys, we estimate U.S. consumer marginal willingness to pay for access to blockchain-based traceability information via QR codes and for more specific sub-region provenance labeling placed on the packaging of two economically important and outbreak-prone leafy greens: romaine lettuce and spinach. After conducting sensitivity testing using a variety of specifications, we find that unrestricted random parameter logit models allowing for correlation across random parameters provide the best model fit. Simulations of willingness to pay distributions indicate a median marginal willingness to pay of about $1.45 for access to traceability information over no access and an additional $0.33-$0.38 if the information is blockchain verified. We also find that voluntary sub-region provenance labeling may result in consumers discounting imported relative to domestically produced leafy greens. If domestically produced, consumers are not willing to pay more to know the region within a state where the product was grown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.