ArticlePloS one2025
Assessing the extent to which front-of-pack labelling regulations could support healthy eating among Canadians.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Canada mandated front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations, requiring pre-packaged foods meeting and/or exceeding thresholds for nutrients-of-concern (saturated fat, sugars, sodium) to display a 'High in' nutrition symbol. Although FOPL regulations align with one of the recommendations of Canada's food guide (CFG), there is limited evidence on how well the regulations could support healthy eating among Canadians. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Canadian pre-packaged food supply according to FOPL regulations and to assess the extent to which the regulations could support healthy eating among Canadians using the Canadian Food Scoring System (CFSS), a nutrient profile model based on the recommendations of CFG. Using a branded food composition database (n = 17,008), pre-packaged foods were categorized according to FOPL regulations and the CFSS. According to FOPL regulations, approximately 54% of pre-packaged foods would display a 'High in' nutrition symbol for meeting and/or exceeding thresholds for at least one nutrient-of-concern. According to the CFSS, approximately 53% of foods were a 'poor' or 'very poor' choice, while 25% were a 'good' or 'excellent' choice. Foods that would not display a 'High in' nutrition symbol showed significant variation in their healthfulness, with 45% containing low amounts of nutritious foods recommended by CFG. Our findings highlight that many pre-packaged foods in Canada do not represent healthy choices. Although many of these foods will be highlighted with a 'High in' nutrition symbol when FOPL regulations are implemented, many foods that would not display a 'High in' nutrition symbol do not align well with the recommendations of CFG, particularly those with a variety of multiple ingredients (e.g., many breads, breakfast cereals, combination dishes). Additional tools and strategies are required to support Canadians make healthy food choices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.