Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060924›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

No news is good news? The declining information value of broadcast news in America.

Johann D Gaebler, Sean J Westwood, Shanto Iyengar, Sharad Goel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johann D GaeblerDepartment of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3340-9542
Sean J WestwoodDepartment of Government, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Shanto IyengarDepartment of Political Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Sharad GoelKennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the rise of digital media, Americans are five times more likely to consume news via television than through online platforms. However, due in large part to technical hurdles, it remains unclear what content appears on broadcast news and how the mixture of content has changed over time. We consider these questions by applying a novel LLM-based approach to an understudied corpus of expert-generated summaries of virtually all news segments aired on the "big three" broadcast networks-ABC, CBS, and NBC-between 1969 and 2024. Results based on nearly one million news segments show that "information density"-the amount of time dedicated to political issues-has declined substantially over the last 50 years. Today, broadcast news spends roughly twice as much time on commercials and "soft" news and half as much on issue-based political coverage compared to a few decades ago. Since the early 1990s, the news has also shifted inward, focusing more on domestic stories and less on international affairs. These changes suggest a transformation in the informative role of broadcast news, raising questions about its impact on voter knowledge and political engagement.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationMass MediaTelevisionHumansPoliticsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41060924
PMCPMC12507307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.