Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060916›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Status and future prospect of deregistered woodland key habitats in Northwestern Sweden.

Ulrika Ervander, Willian T A F Silva, Karin C Harding, Micael Jonsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ulrika ErvanderDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-2411
Willian T A F SilvaDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Karin C HardingDepartment of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Micael JonssonDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Geocience, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1618-2617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extensive primary boreal forests within Europe are primarily located in Fennoscandia and northwestern Russia. These forests host numerous endemic and red-listed species but are rapidly being exploited and transformed to production forests that lack the habitat characteristics that are required for sustained biodiversity. Over the past 30 years, certain highly valuable areas within Swedish forests have been designated and registered as "woodland key habitats" (WKH) to be safeguarded from clear-cutting. However, despite their high conservation values, WKH lack proper legislative protection. Recently, many WKH were deregistered and thereby lost their potential protection against clear-cutting, jeopardizing biodiversity values in these forests. Moreover, the former way of classifying WKH has been criticized for being too lenient, making conventional forestry difficult. To assess the leniency of WKH registration and effect of WKH deregistration, we conducted a field inventory of WKH following a new inventory method proposed by the Swedish Forest Agency, featuring more stringent criteria for classification of WKH in north-western Sweden. The inventory was conducted in 9 still registered and 9 recently deregistered WKH to assess their conservation values. Our inventory results show that all 18 areas reach the criteria for WKH with the new method, despite higher, more stringent thresholds for conservation values. Hence, formerly registered WKH were not deregistered due to lower values. Moreover, analysis of recent harvest actions within deregistered WKH in Sweden showed that almost 1,200 hectares (~ 2%) of these areas were clear-cut or reported for clear-cutting 1-7 years post deregistration. As such, our results indicate that WKH contain high values, even using more stringent classification criteria, but also that deregistration of WKH does not consider these values and increases the risk of losing them to forest management. Given past and current declines in forest biodiversity, this is concerning, as conservation of areas containing high conservation values are needed, in order to preserve biodiversity in boreal forests.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemForestryForestsBiodiversitySweden

Identifiers

PMID41060916
PMCPMC12507246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.