Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060888›Full record

ArticleJBRA assisted reproduction2025

Comparison of the biomechanical characteristics of human ovarian tissue after vitrification versus slow freezing.

Marta Méndez, Carolina Herranz-Diez, Santiago González, Janisse Ferreri, Josep Maria Calafell, Jordi Otero, Ramon Farre, Salvadora Civico, Francesc Fabregues

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JBRA assisted reproduction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marta MéndezInstitute of Gynaecology Obstetrics and Neonatology of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Spain.
Carolina Herranz-DiezBiophysics and Bioengineering Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Santiago GonzálezBCNatal, Sant Joan de Déu University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Janisse FerreriCEFER Reproduction Institute, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria CalafellInstitute of Gynaecology Obstetrics and Neonatology of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Spain.
Jordi OteroBiophysics and Bioengineering Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ramon FarreBiophysics and Bioengineering Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvadora CivicoInstitute of Gynaecology Obstetrics and Neonatology of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Spain.
Francesc FabreguesInstitute of Gynaecology Obstetrics and Neonatology of Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNumerous studies have compared ovarian tissue cryopreservation methods, including slow freezing/rapid thawing (SF/RT) and vitrification/warming (V/W), focusing on morpho-functional status, follicle density, stromal cell integrity, and gene expression during in vitro culture. However, results remain inconclusive. This study aims to evaluate the effects of SF/RT and V/W on the ovarian cortex's biomechanical properties.

methodsHuman ovarian biopsies were taken from five women between 32 and 45 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery for tubal sterilization. For each patient, one small sample of fresh tissue was used as control, and the remaining tissue were vitrified or frozen by slow freezing method. The tissue stiffness of the cryopreserved samples at the micrometer scale was measured by Atomic Force Microscopy after thawing and warming, depending of the cryopreservation method.

resultsThe median stiffness of the ovarian cortex was 3670.00 Pa (Pascal) (IQR 2146.4) in the control group. After cryopreservation, the median stiffness slightly decreased to 1305.90 Pa (IQR 503.51) with SF/RT and to 2284.50 Pa (IQR 3314.40) with V/W. General linear model analysis revealed no significant effect of cryopreservation method on the ovarian cortex stiffness (F=2.750, p=0.071). No significant differences were observed based on the intra-sample zone studied by AFM. However, a significant inter-patient effect on tissue stiffness was identified (F=3.958, p=0.006).

conclusionsThe study findings suggest that ovarian tissue freezing methods do not have a relevant impact on functional aspects of the extracellular matrix (ECM), suggesting that given the logistical advantages of vitrification, this technique should be prioritized.

Indexed as

CryopreservationOvaryVitrificationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFreezingHumansMiddle Agedmechanobiologyovarian cryopreservationslow freezingtissue stiffnessvitrification

Identifiers

PMID41060888
PMCPMC12695001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.