ArticleThe Journal of general virology2025
Isolation and passaging of reptarenaviruses utilizing cultured snake cells suggest tissue tropism and restrictions in segment reassortment.
Article in The Journal of general virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reptarenaviruses cause boid inclusion body disease that can affect the fitness of the infected animals through a variety of clinical signs. Reptarenaviruses infect most tissue types in the affected individuals and spread efficiently in captive snake collections. Their genome consists of a small (S) and a large (L) segment, and the reptarenavirus-infected snakes often carry multiple genetically divergent reptarenavirus S and L segments, suggesting reptarenavirus coinfections occur frequently. We previously observed that reptarenavirus S and L segment combinations may vary between the tissues of an infected snake, leading to the hypothesis that the segment combination might contribute to tissue and/or species tropism. To test the hypothesis, we inoculated various cell lines derived from different tissues of several constrictor snake species with two samples containing multiple reptarenavirus segments (F15, two S and seven L segments; F17, one S and four L segments). We blind-passaged both virus samples five times in each cell line and monitored the presence of the segments in the supernatants through reverse transcription PCR. We also passaged the cells following the first inoculation with F17 and studied the segments present as above. The analysis revealed that some L segments were only present in supernatants with a specific S segment, suggesting preferred S and L segment pairs, thereby arguing against free reassortment of the segments. The results also showed that boa constrictor-derived cell lines supported reptarenavirus infection slightly better than pythonid-derived cell lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.