ArticleChemSusChem2025
Balancing Polysulfide Distribution in "Anode-Free" Lithium-Sulfide Batteries.
Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-sulfide positive electrodes represent a promising alternative to established transition metal-based positive electrodes due to enhanced specific capacity and sustainability. While positive electrodes containing elemental sulfur require a lithiated negative electrode, lithium-sulfide can serve as the lithium reservoir and thus be paired with bare copper electrodes in "anode-free" or "zero-excess" cell concepts. This boosts energy density and avoids handling of thin lithium metal electrodes. While promising electrochemical performance of "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries has already been demonstrated, many reported cell configurations rely on nickel- instead of copper-based negative electrodes, undermining the enhanced sustainability bestowed by lithium-sulfide positive electrodes. Demonstrating a continuous reaction between copper electrodes and soluble polysulfide species, two approaches are evaluated that restrict the migration of polysulfide species. While both, in situ polymerization of an electrolyte additive as well as electrospinning of a polymer layer at negative electrodes, enable reversible operation of copper-based "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries, the former approach offers notably enhanced capacity retention. Counterintuitively, the quantification of polysulfide distribution throughout the individual battery components reveals less confinement within the positive electrode as beneficial for the overall reversibility. This demonstrates that a balance between positive and negative electrode reversibility is required to advance "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.