Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060795›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2025

Balancing Polysulfide Distribution in "Anode-Free" Lithium-Sulfide Batteries.

Lennart Wichmann, Aleksei Sadykov, Pascal Seete, Bärbel Tengen, Peng Yan, Tom Boenke, Isidora Cekic-Laskovic, Sascha Nowak, Holger Althues, Stefan Kaskel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lennart WichmannHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Aleksei SadykovMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Pascal SeeteChair of Inorganic Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Bärbel TengenHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Peng YanHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Tom BoenkeDepartment Chemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute of Materials and Beam Technology (IWS), Winterbergstraße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Isidora Cekic-LaskovicHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Sascha NowakMEET Battery Research Center, Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Münster, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Holger AlthuesDepartment Chemical Surface and Battery Technology, Fraunhofer Institute of Materials and Beam Technology (IWS), Winterbergstraße 28, 01277, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan KaskelChair of Inorganic Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Bergstraße 66, 01069, Dresden, Germany.
Martin WinterHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Gunther BrunklausHelmholtz - Institute Münster, IMD-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Corrensstr. 46, 48149, Münster, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-1383

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung BMBF 13XP0559AMinistry for Culture and Science of North Rhine Westphalia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithium-sulfide positive electrodes represent a promising alternative to established transition metal-based positive electrodes due to enhanced specific capacity and sustainability. While positive electrodes containing elemental sulfur require a lithiated negative electrode, lithium-sulfide can serve as the lithium reservoir and thus be paired with bare copper electrodes in "anode-free" or "zero-excess" cell concepts. This boosts energy density and avoids handling of thin lithium metal electrodes. While promising electrochemical performance of "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries has already been demonstrated, many reported cell configurations rely on nickel- instead of copper-based negative electrodes, undermining the enhanced sustainability bestowed by lithium-sulfide positive electrodes. Demonstrating a continuous reaction between copper electrodes and soluble polysulfide species, two approaches are evaluated that restrict the migration of polysulfide species. While both, in situ polymerization of an electrolyte additive as well as electrospinning of a polymer layer at negative electrodes, enable reversible operation of copper-based "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries, the former approach offers notably enhanced capacity retention. Counterintuitively, the quantification of polysulfide distribution throughout the individual battery components reveals less confinement within the positive electrode as beneficial for the overall reversibility. This demonstrates that a balance between positive and negative electrode reversibility is required to advance "anode-free" lithium-sulfide batteries.

Indexed as

anode‐freefunctional separatorslithium–sulfur batteriesreversibilityshuttle effect

Identifiers

PMID41060795
PMCPMC12665886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.