Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060661›Full record

ArticleJAMA2025

Respiratory Gas Shifts to Delay Asphyxiation in Critical Avalanche Burial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Frederik Eisendle, Giulia Roveri, Simon Rauch, Øyvind Thomassen, Tomas Dal Cappello, Jörg Assmus, Sandro Malacrida, Tobias Kammerer, Jürg Schweizer, Nicola Borasio and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05779540 (A New Device to Delay Asphyxiation in Subjects Critically Buried in Avalanche Debris), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05779540 naunknown statusnot on this map

A New Device to Delay Asphyxiation in Subjects Critically Buried in Avalanche Debris: Efficacy and Pathophysiological Implications

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Mountain Emergency MedicineRan2023 to 2024Enrolled26ConditionsAvalanche, Landslide, or Mudslide, Asphyxia, ImmersionArmsSafeback SBX, Sham device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergency care for avalanche buried patients - a narrative review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Frederik EisendleInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Giulia RoveriInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Simon RauchInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Øyvind ThomassenMountain Medicine Research Group, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway.
Tomas Dal CappelloInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Jörg AssmusMountain Medicine Research Group, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway.
Sandro MalacridaInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Tobias KammererDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Jürg SchweizerWSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.
Nicola BorasioInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Viviane DörckDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Markus FalkInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Marika FallaInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Nicola FruzzettiCorpo Nazionale del Soccorso Alpino e Speleologico - CNSAS, Milano, Italy.
Matilde MaxentiInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Sigurd MydskeMountain Medicine Research Group, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway.
Gian Mauro SassoCorpo Nazionale del Soccorso Alpino e Speleologico - CNSAS, Milano, Italy.
Giovanni VinettiInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Bernd WallnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Guttorm BrattebøMountain Medicine Research Group, The Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, Bergen, Norway.
Hermann BruggerInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.
Giacomo StrapazzonInstitute of Mountain Emergency Medicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: People who are critically buried by an avalanche typically die of asphyxia within 35 minutes, often making timely rescue impossible. The development of new strategies to delay asphyxiation is crucial to improve survival rates. Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a novel, user-carried avalanche safety device that delivers airflow from avalanche debris to the user's airway without requiring supplemental oxygen or a mouthpiece. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, blinded, clinical trial was organized by 4 institutions and conducted at 1 field location in Italy from January to March 2023. Healthy volunteers aged 18 to 60 years were enrolled. Trial participants underwent a critical snow burial simulation while in a prone position covered by at least 50 cm of snow. Vital parameters were continuously monitored throughout the simulation to ensure participant safety and to collect physiological data. Interventions: Participants were randomized to the safety device group (using the Safeback SBX device) or the control group (using a sham device). The safety device group completed an unblinded control in which the participants who remained buried after 35 minutes were seamlessly transferred to the sham device. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was the time to oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2) less than 80% (event) during 35 minutes of monitoring, comparing intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes included oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations at different distances in the snow. Results: Of 36 randomized participants, 24 performed and completed the trial and were included in the final analysis. The median (IQR) age was 27 (25-32) years, and 13 (54%) were male. In the safety device group, the median (IQR) burial duration was 35.0 (35.0-35.0) minutes and there were no events; in the control group, the median (IQR) burial duration was 6.4 (4.8-13.5) minutes and there were 7 events. The safety device group had a significantly lower risk of termination due to Spo2 less than 80% (P < .001 for both log-rank and Breslow tests). Carbon dioxide in the air pocket was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.0%-1.6%) vs 6.1% (95% CI, 5.1%-7.1%) and oxygen was 19.8% (95% CI, 19.5%-20.1%) vs 12.4% (95% CI, 11.2%-13.5%) at the same points in the safety device and control groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: A user-carried avalanche safety device that delivers airflow from avalanche debris to the user's airways without requiring supplemental oxygen delayed critical hypoxemia and hypercapnia during simulated critical burial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05779540.

Identifiers

PMID41060661
PMCPMC12509078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.