Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060650›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Trainee-Physician Milestones Ratings and Patient Experience Surveys in Early Unsupervised Practice.

Jenny X Chen, Deirdre Mylod, Yuezhou Jing, Madeleine Kerschner, Bruce Trock, Steve Meth, Kenji Yamazaki, Sean O Hogan, Misop Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenny X ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Deirdre MylodPress Ganey Associates, Inc., South Bend, Indiana.
Yuezhou JingJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Madeleine KerschnerPress Ganey Associates, Inc., South Bend, Indiana.
Bruce TrockJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Steve MethJohns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kenji YamazakiAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois.
Sean O HoganAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, Illinois.
Misop HanJames Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Milestones ratings have been used to assess resident physicians for more than a decade, but little is known as to whether there are posttraining implications of ratings for patient experiences. Objective: To investigate the association of residents' Milestones ratings of professionalism and interpersonal and communication skills (ICS) with patient experience survey results in the first year of unsupervised practice. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included physicians who completed residency training at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs between July 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019, and subsequently worked at facilities that collected Clinician & Group-Consumer Assessments of Healthcare Providers and Systems Surveys (CG-CAHPS). Milestones ratings from adult primary care training programs (internal medicine, family medicine, and obstetrics and gynecology) and patient survey data were linked for physicians who had more than 30 CG-CAHPS results in their first year of unsupervised practice. Physician characteristics (sex and specialty), CG-CAHPS patient respondent demographics (sex, race, and language spoken at home), and a CG-CAHPS question about a facility-related experience were collected for multivariable linear regression analyses. Data were analyzed from February 1, 2024 to April 10, 2025. Exposures: Mean professionalism and ICS scores in Milestones evaluations collected 6 months before the end of training. Physicians were categorized into those with higher (≥3.5) or lower (<3.5) mean scores. Main Outcomes and Measures: CG-CAHPS Top Box scores for 6 questions pertaining to physician behaviors and the overall clinician rating. (Top Box scores denote the percentage of patients who selected the most favorable response option.). Results: A total of 1349 physicians (753 [55.8%] aged 26-30 years; 804 [59.6%] female) were included in the analysis. Higher mean professionalism or ICS Milestones ratings were associated with higher Top Box scores across all CG-CAHPS questions pertaining to physician-related experiences (eg, adjusted mean difference in physician's knowledge of the patient's medical history: professionalism, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.4-4.5] percentage points; P < .001; ICS, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.5-4.9] percentage points; P < .001) as well as overall physician ratings (adjusted mean difference: professionalism, 2.9 [95% CI, 1.4-4.3] percentage points; P < .001; ICS, 3.5 [95% CI, 2-5.1] percentage points; P < .001) in multivariable linear regression models. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of physicians who completed residency in adult primary care specialties, those with higher mean professionalism and ICS Milestones ratings in training received better patient experience survey ratings in their first year of unsupervised practice. These findings suggest that trainees with lower ratings may benefit from intervention.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceInternship and ResidencyPatient SatisfactionProfessionalismAdultEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41060650
PMCPMC12509016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.