Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060637›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2025

Interaction and Effect Modification in Clinical and Epidemiological Studies: Part 38 of a Series on the Evaluation of Scientific Publications.

Bernd Kowall, Andreas Stang, Wolfgang Rathmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Methods for modeling gene-environment interplay using polygenic risk scores.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernd Kowall
Andreas Stang
Wolfgang Rathmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common objective of studies in clinical research is to investigate the effect of an individual factor on the course of a disease. Studying the combined effect of two or more factors on an outcome variable is more complex, as is the question whether an effect varies across subgroups (e.g., men vs. women). The concepts of interaction and effect modification are useful for analyses of this kind.

methodsThis review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search. The concepts of interaction and effect modification are illustrated using examples involving real and fictitious data.

resultsAn interaction is present when, for example, taking two drugs reduces the risk of a disease by an amount that differs from the sum of the individual effects. In contrast, an effect modification is present when, for example, the effect of a drug on the risk of disease varies depending on the presence or absence of a particular genotype. In this article, the concepts of interaction, effect modification, synergism, and antagonism are explained. Interactions can occur on either an additive or a multiplicative scale. Moreover, quantitative measures of interactions on the additive scale are explained, and the potential for misinterpreting evaluations of interactions in regression analyses is discussed.

conclusionThe concepts of interaction and effect modification provide valuable insights for the prevention and treatment of disease.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesEffect Modifier, EpidemiologicHumans

Identifiers

PMID41060637
PMCPMC12895244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.