ArticleJAMA cardiology2025
Contributions of Common, Rare, and Somatic Genetic Variants to Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in JAMA cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Freely available genomic datasets for atrial fibrillation research: current resources and analytical pipeline.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Pooled it
- Improving Polygenic Risk Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in East Asian Populations.JACC. Asia · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Cardiometabolic Disease: Expanding Beyond a Hematologic Phenomenon.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Interaction between clinical and genetic risk of atrial fibrillation in the danish diet, cancer and health cohort.Open heart · 2026Article
- From polygenic risk to digital twins: the future of personalised cardiovascular medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Risk factors for atrial fibrillation after lung cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has a complex genetic architecture involving common, rare, and somatic variants. The association between these components requires further investigation. Objective: To examine the individual and combined contributions of polygenic, monogenic, and somatic genetic variants to AF incidence, and develop an integrated genomic model (IGM-AF) for improved risk prediction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used whole-genome sequence data from participants of the UK Biobank, with follow-up for AF events through hospital records, death registries, and self-report. The UK Biobank recruited participants aged 40 to 69 years in the UK between 2006 and 2010. Study data were analyzed from August 2022 to November 2024. Exposures: IGM-AF comprising an AF polygenic risk score (PRS), a composite rare variant gene set (AFgeneset), and somatic variants associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). Clinical AF risk was estimated using the Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology AF (CHARGE-AF) score. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was hazard ratios (HRs) for 5-year incident AF attributable to PRS, AFgeneset, CHIP, and their interactions. The predictive performance of IGM-AF and its components was quantified using HRs, C statistics, and reclassification indices. Results: A total of 416 085 individuals (mean [SD] age, 56.6 [8.0] years; 224 642 female [54.0%]) with 30 797 AF cases were included. The PRS (HR per 1 SD, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.63-1.67; P < 1 × 10-8), AFgeneset (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.52-1.75; P = 1.46 × 10-42), and CHIP (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.15-1.38; P = 1.41 × 10-6) were associated with incident AF. The 5-year cumulative incidence of AF was at least 2-fold among individuals having all 3 genetic drivers (common, rare, and somatic drivers) compared with those with only 1 driver. Integration of IGM-AF with a clinical risk model (CHARGE-AF) showed higher predictive performance (C statistic, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.80-0.80) compared with IGM-AF and CHARGE-AF alone. The classification of the at-risk population for AF was improved when IGM-AF was added to CHARGE-AF (net reclassification index, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.07-0.09). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study demonstrated the complementary value of common, rare, and somatic variants in shaping genomic AF risk. Leveraging comprehensive genetic information may enhance screening and preventive interventions for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.