Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060582›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2025

Assessing the feasibility of mechanical recycling for plastic tree shelters used in agriculture and forestry: degradation and contamination of waste.

Ignacio Bernabé, Ma Ulagares de la Orden, Enrique Blázquez-Blázquez, Ma Luisa Cerrada, Gabriela Castro, Victoria Fernández-Fernández, Miguel Cobo-Golpe, María Ramil, Isaac Rodríguez, Joaquín Martínez Urreaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ignacio BernabéDepartment of Industrial and Environmental Chemical Engineering, E.T.S.I. Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Ma Ulagares de la OrdenDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Facultad de Óptica y Optometría, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Blázquez-BlázquezInstitute of Science and Technology of Polymers (ICTP-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Ma Luisa CerradaInstitute of Science and Technology of Polymers (ICTP-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Gabriela CastroDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Aquatic One Health Research Center (ARCUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
Victoria Fernández-FernándezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Aquatic One Health Research Center (ARCUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
Miguel Cobo-GolpeDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Aquatic One Health Research Center (ARCUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
María RamilDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Aquatic One Health Research Center (ARCUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
Isaac RodríguezDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Nutrition and Food Sciences, Aquatic One Health Research Center (ARCUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15782, Spain.
Joaquín Martínez UrreagaDepartment of Industrial and Environmental Chemical Engineering, E.T.S.I. Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. joaquin.martinez@upm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-8897

Funding

Horizon 2020 860407Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TED2021-129962B-C42Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación TED2021-130166B-I00Universidad Politécnica de Madrid RP2205430163Universidad Politécnica de Madrid RP2505430069Xunta de Galicia ED431C2021/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic tree shelters are widely used in agriculture and forestry to protect young plants from predators and generate a favorable microclimate, thus increasing survival and growth rates. Considering that several thousand tons of plastic tree shelters (mostly polypropylene, PP) are used each year in Europe and that discarded aged shelters can release microplastics, residues of additives, and even pesticides, the destination of this material after use is a matter of concern. Mechanical recycling is the best option for these residues, but its technical feasibility depends on the polymer degradation level and its contamination, both by inorganic materials and by residues of additives and/or agrochemicals. Therefore, not all tree shelter waste is suitable for recycling. The main objective of this work is to characterize the degradation and contamination of PP tree shelters used in agriculture and forestry, to obtain information on the feasibility of their mechanical recycling. The results show the presence of fungicide residues only in some tubes used in agriculture. Although the external faces of the tubes appear strongly degraded, the degradation of the overall tube material is much less due to a dilution effect. Thus, we can conclude that most PP tree shelters, even those used for several years in harsh climates, could be successfully subjected to mechanical recycling.

Indexed as

AgricultureForestryPlasticsRecyclingTreesPlasticsAgricultureContaminationDegradationForestryMechanical recyclingPlastic tree sheltersPolypropylene

Identifiers

PMID41060582
PMCPMC12553568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.