ArticleOdontology2026
Development and in vitro evaluation of a xylitol/erythritol carbomer gel for xerostomia relief.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Xerostomia, or dry mouth, significantly impairs oral health and quality of life. Artificial saliva formulations can provide symptomatic relief and protect oral tissues. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a xylitol/erythritol-based Carbomer gel as an artificial saliva substitute. The gel formulation was prepared and characterized for physicochemical properties, mucoadhesion, and antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), biofilm inhibition, and biofilm disruption were assessed using standardized microbiological assays with triplicate replicates. The formulated gel demonstrated optimal pH (~ 8), appropriate viscosity, and a mucoadhesive duration of 50 min. Compared to a commercial control (Mucosamin), the gel showed superior antimicrobial effects with MIC and MBC values of X/256 and X/128, respectively. Biofilm inhibition reached 72.3% at the MIC concentration, significantly higher than the control (60.1%, p < 0.05). Biofilm disruption was similarly enhanced. This xylitol/erythritol Carbomer gel shows promising physicochemical and antimicrobial properties for xerostomia relief. While in vitro findings indicate potential clinical utility, further studies, including clinical trials, are warranted to confirm efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41060546What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.