Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060530›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2025

Non-cohabiting Partners' Economic Characteristics and the Transition to Living Together in Germany: A Couple-Level Perspective.

Valeria Ferraretto, Nicole Hiekel, Agnese Vitali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valeria FerrarettoDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-1842
Nicole HiekelMax Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany. hiekel@demogr.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7180-7931
Agnese VitaliDepartment of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0029-9447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living together marks an important step in the progression of intimate partner relationships. While existing literature highlights the relevance of both partners' economic characteristics for union formation, it remains unclear whether both partners' economic characteristics are equally linked to the transition to co-residence, whether one partner's traits matter more, and how this varies by gender. We address these gaps by examining how the economic characteristics of women and men in non-residential relationships relate to their transition to co-residence. Using 13 waves (2008-2021) of the German Family Panel pairfam and Cox proportional hazards model, we analyse 7165 non-residential relationships, capturing dyadic data on partners' employment status, contract type, and income. Our findings show that economic factors significantly influence the likelihood of moving in together. Couples with two employed partners are most likely to move in together, while gender plays a role when only one partner works-this transition being more likely when the man is employed. Among employed individuals, higher income increases the probability of moving in together for both men and women. Additionally, temporary employment raises the likelihood of starting a co-residence exclusively for women. Overall, results suggest that men's employment status plays a pivotal role in this transition and that union formation is socially stratified among young adults, reinforcing gender inequalities in partnership dynamics.

Indexed as

CohabitationEconomic characteristicsEmploymentGender inequalitiesGermanyUnion formation

Identifiers

PMID41060530
PMCPMC12508365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.