ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Global trends in retroperitoneal sarcomas surgery: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2024.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Total laparoscopic R0 resection of a large retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma HARBORING a rare TP53 mutation: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRetroperitoneal sarcomas are located in the retroperitoneum, characterized by a low incidence rate but a high degree of aggressiveness. Currently, surgery stands as the only curative treatment. This literature aims to employ a bibliometric analysis to systematically evaluate the research hotspots and trends in retroperitoneal sarcomas surgery.
methodsAuthors retrieved publications related to retroperitoneal sarcomas surgery from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and PubMed databases spanning the period from 2005 to 2024. Subsequently, R, VOSviewer and CiteSpace software were employed to conduct bibliometric and visual analysis on the included publications.
resultsA total of 689 publications were included from 203 countries/regions and 2678 institutions. The United States had the highest number of publications, and Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori is the top research institutions. The most frequently co-cited keywords were "soft tissue sarcoma", "management" and "survival". The research themes over the past decade have primarily centered around "management", "prognostic factors" and "inferior vena cava".
conclusionsThis study utilized three widely recognized bibliometric software tools to conduct a bibliometric analysis on retroperitoneal sarcomas surgery. The results emphasize the significance of precise diagnosis, vascular reconstruction and prognostic factors, providing practical information for other scholars to understand key directions and frontier information in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.