ArticleMemory & cognition2026
The conceptual relatedness of post-encoding interference influences forgetting for central details in complex memories.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The importance of the post-encoding period for memory retention is clear from studies of retroactive interference. However, it is less clear how the nature of post-encoding information determines the mnemonic fate of complex memories, which contain both central details describing the unfolding of the event and peripheral details which provide perceptual richness. The goal of the present study was to test whether interfering narratives composed of central details varying in conceptual similarity causes retroactive interference for details from the encoded memory. Experiment 1 used a between-subjects design where participants encoded videos depicting complex events (e.g., going to a restaurant) followed by a post-encoding period consisting of an unfilled delay or an interfering narrative that was either related (e.g., going to a restaurant) or unrelated to the event (e.g., taking an art class). The interfering narratives were composed of only central details and were presented auditorily, to minimize overlap with peripheral details in the videos. Half of the videos were recalled immediately, and half were recalled after 24-hours. We found that central details were forgotten more in the unrelated post-encoding group than the other two groups. Experiment 2 replicated the difference in central detail recall between related and unrelated post-encoding interference using a within-subjects design. We reveal that retroactive interference for complex memories may be determined both by the conceptual similarity of the interfering information and by the overlap between the types of details being interfered with.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41060494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.