ArticleActa neurochirurgica2025
Epileptogenic LGG surgery with seizure freedom purpose: Supratotal resection (ETT-SpTR) based on Electrocorticography and navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inhibitory glutamatergic feedback for brain tumor therapy.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLow-grade gliomas (LGG)-related seizures may persist after gross total resection (GTR). Supratotal resection (SpTR) seems to have better seizure outcomes, likely due to removing the epileptogenic peritumoral neocortex. However, its role in achieving postoperative seizure freedom remains poorly considered, likely because SpTR is achievable in only one out of three patients.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected series of epileptogenic surgically resected LGGs. Intraoperative Electrocorticography (iECoG) guided the extension of GTR to areas with interictal activity and negative on navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS). Patients were divided into Group I (GTR) and Group II [iECoG nTMS Tailored - SpTR (ETT-SpTR)], and we compared the seizure outcomes at follow-up (minimum 12 months). We also compared the rate of postoperative neurological deficits.
resultsThirty patients were included. Group I (n = 15) showed only a 20% rate of seizure freedom (Engel IA), compared to 86.6% in Group II (n = 15, p = 0.0001). Neurological outcomes showed no differences between groups. Four patients (13.3%) with resection margins < 1 cm from nTMS-positive points developed transient deficits; no deficits were observed for distances > 1 cm.
conclusionThe ETT-SpTR is more frequently achievable than radiologically defined SpTR. In our experience, ETT-SpTR yields better seizure outcomes without compromising functional outcomes compared to GTR. In our cohort, iECoG is a reliable technique for identifying LGG-related epileptogenic foci, while nTMS is a trustworthy method for predicting postoperative deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.