Trial reportAnnals of hematology2025
Mesenchymal stem cells for the adjunctive treatment of cytomegalovirus pneumonia in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a Single-center prospective study.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Management of CMV Pneumonia, DAH, and BOS Following HSCT in a Child with β-Thalassemia: A Case Report.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as an adjuvant therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) through a prospective study. From June 2016 to June 2022, 43 patients were diagnosed with CMV pneumonia after allo-HSCT and received antiviral therapy, of whom 24 received MSCs infusion. The primary endpoints of the study were the cure rate and the time to cure of CMV pneumonia, and the secondary endpoint was the overall survival after CMV pneumonia. The 2-year overall survival post-pneumonia in MSCs group was significantly better than that in non-MSCs group (74% vs. 50%, p = 0.034). Cure rate of pneumonia in MSCs group was higher than that in non-MSCs group without statistical significance (79% vs. 63%, p = 0.245). Time (days) to cure in MSCs group was shorter than that in non-MSCs group without statistical significance (39[14-142] vs. 54[6-157], p = 0.765). The high mortality rate of CMV pneumonia after allo-HSCT leads to a poor prognosis. The use of MSCs improves the overall survival of CMV pneumonia. The cure rate and time to cure of pneumonia were not improved statistically. At present, there is still a lack of prospective studies on MSCs in the treatment of pneumonia after HSCT, which needs to be supplemented in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.