ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[What is established in the medical treatment of heart failure?]
Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of heart failure varies depending on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and poses a significant clinical challenge in patients with reduced (HFrEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF), or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In HFrEF/HFmrEF, the diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms such as dyspnea or peripheral edema, as well as an LVEF < 50%. Treatment primarily relies on renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (preferably angiotensin receptor-neprilysin-inhibitors, ARNIs), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i). These agents have a class I recommendation and significantly reduce both mortality and hospitalization rates. Rapid and comprehensive implementation of this therapeutic strategy substantially improves prognosis. Additional agents such as ivabradine or vericiguat can be considered. With the recent publication of the DIGIT-HF study, evidence now also supports the use of digitoxin in advanced HFrEF to further reduce mortality and hospitalizations. Iron deficiency is common in HFrEF and is associated with worse outcomes. Intravenous iron supplementation improves exercise capacity and reduces the risk of hospitalization especially after a decompensation. In patients with HFpEF, treatment focuses on symptomatic relief and rigorous management of comorbidities. Diuretics for volume overload have a class I recommendation, as they effectively alleviate symptoms. SGLT2i also play a key role in HFpEF and are recommended with class I evidence in current guidelines. FINEARTS-HF recently showed promising results for the non-steroidal MRA finerenone, which reduces cardiovascular death/hospitalizations. Furthermore, metabolically targeted therapies such as GLP‑1 receptor agonists are gaining importance in obese HFpEF patients, as they have been shown to improve quality of life and reduce heart failure-related events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41060409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.