ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Species-level taxonomic characterization enhances the power of saliva and feces stain microbiota for inferring the time since deposition (TsD).
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individual identification and time since deposition estimation based on community structure and absolute abundance of the exposed vaginal microbiome.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate identification of body fluid stains found at crime scenes and inference of the time since deposition support forensic investigations. Forensic microbiology is recognized as a promising approach for addressing these challenges. Saliva and feces, which are frequently obtained as biological samples at crime scenes, contain greatly enriched bacterial communities. Therefore, we collected saliva and feces stains exposed to indoor environment. To simulate the time intervals typically encountered in forensic evidence examination, samples were exposed to indoor conditions for a 3-day short-term interval, and control samples were collected on the 3rd day to simulate the time point of arrest. We utilized the 16S rDNA full-length sequencing to characterize the microbial community. The results showed that microbial community composition of fresh body fluids, whether saliva or feces samples, remained stable on day 0 and day 3, with no substantial changes after 6 hour of exposure. The relative abundance of the dominant flora changed mainly after 24 h of exposure, such as an increase in Streptococcus oralis in saliva and a decrease in Bifidobacterium adolescentis in feces, and remained stable after 48 h and 72 h. The decrease in humidity seems to cause a reduction in some fluid flora, such as Prevotella melaninogenica in saliva. This suggests that collecting body fluid stain samples and recording environmental factors as early as possible after a case may increase the reliability of the evidence. In addition, saliva and feces stains exhibited distinct microbial composition profiles after exposure, indicating that they retained the potential for body fluid identification. The difference mainly stemmed from the respective dominant flora. Then, the time since deposition (TsD) prediction models were constructed, using a random forest regression algorithm, based on genus-level and species-level, respectively. The predictive efficacy of species-level microbial markers was higher, with the mean absolute error (MAE) of the saliva and feces prediction models being 0.30 day and 0.56 day, respectively. This finding suggests that using species-level microbial markers to determine the type and time since deposition (TsD) of body fluid stains has promising forensic value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41060398What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.