Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060342›Full record

ArticleOecologia2025

Constant herbivory rates and plant-herbivore interactions along a resource availability gradient in South African fynbos.

Alexander Neu, Huw Cooksley, Karen J Esler, Anton Pauw, Francois Roets, Frank M Schurr, Matthias Schleuning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander NeuSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. alneu87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0192-0661
Huw CooksleyInstitute of Landscape and Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-8997
Karen J EslerDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-727X
Anton PauwPlant Conservation Unit, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4012-648X
Francois RoetsDepartment of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3849-9057
Frank M SchurrInstitute of Landscape and Plant Ecology, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4518-0602
Matthias SchleuningSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9426-045X

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHL1934/1-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SCHU2259/3-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-herbivore interactions are important for almost all terrestrial ecosystems, but little is known about how herbivory and the specialization of these interactions change with the resource availability provided by host plant communities and time since disturbance. In fire-prone scrublands of the South African Cape Floristic Region, we studied interaction networks between 20 Protea shrub species and ten herbivorous insect species that consume seeds inside Protea cones during their larval stage. We studied these interactions at 18 sites that differed widely in plant resource availability (protea cone mass per hectare) and time since the last fire event. We sampled 1173 protea cones, identified the herbivores in each cone, and calculated herbivory rate (the proportion of infested cones), herbivore diversity (herbivore species richness and Shannon diversity), the number of host plant species per herbivore species (insect generality), the number of herbivore species per host plant species (plant vulnerability), as well as niche overlap among insect and plant species for each site. We found that most herbivore species interacted with the majority of Protea species. Herbivory rate and herbivore diversity were not affected by site-level resource availability or time since fire. Surprisingly, specialization of plant-herbivore interactions at the community level was independent of the environmental gradients studied, suggesting that the mechanisms structuring the interactions in this plant-herbivore system were independent of the environmental context. This finding suggests coupled community dynamics of protea plants and the insect herbivores feeding inside their cones in South African fynbos ecosystems.

Indexed as

EcosystemHerbivoryInsectaProteaceaeAnimalsBiodiversitySouth AfricaEcological networksEndophagous insectsPlant–animal interactionsProteaSeed predation

Identifiers

PMID41060342
PMCPMC12507943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.