ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025
Neurology training in italy: a perceived proficiency-based survey on Italian residency programmes and compliance with European training standards.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurophobia in health profession students and practitioners: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM).Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince 2005, the European Training Requirements in Neurology (ETRN) have defined the clinical, practical, and research competencies expected in European neurology residency programmes. However, significant variability in training quality persists among Italian programmes. This survey, conducted by the Italian Section of Young Neurologists, aimed to assess how closely Italian neurology residency programmes with ETRN standards and to evaluate residents' and early-career neurologists' self-reported perceived knowledge, practical skills, and access to specialized training.
methodsAn anonymous, online survey was distributed in November 2023 to neurology residents and recently qualified neurologists across Italy. The 39-item questionnaire covered four sections: demographics, residency programme structure, learning objectives, and out-of-network internship opportunities. Responses were evaluated using descriptive statistics and comparative analyses across institution sizes and training years.
resultsOf 248 respondents (45.2% female, mean age 28.9 years), only 70.5% of ETRN's basic training objectives were met, with lower compliance observed for advanced competencies. Practical skills like lumbar puncture and history-taking were widely acquired, but advanced diagnostic techniques (e.g., EMG, neuro-sonography) and subspecialty training (e.g., neuro-oncology, palliative care) showed limited availability. Out-of-network internship participation was low (21.7%), mainly due to institutional constraints and lack of financial support, limiting exposure to diverse clinical environments.
conclusionsResidency programmes demonstrate moderate adherence to ETRN standards at the basic level, though significant gaps remain in advanced training, diagnostic techniques, and interdisciplinary skills. Enhanced standardization, improved funding for extra-network internships, and focused efforts on advanced training are essential to elevate Italian neurology residency programmes to meet European standards more fully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41060338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.