ArticleThe ISME journal2025
SAR11 ecotypes across ocean basins change with depth due to changes in light and oxygen.
Article in The ISME journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecology of prokaryotic DNA viruses in a highly impacted coastal lagoon revealed through comparative and temporal metagenomics.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Converting relative amplicon abundances to absolute abundances via flow cytometry: metagenomic validation and application to long ocean transects.ISME communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SAR11 bacteria are ubiquitous and abundant heterotrophs that are important mediators of marine biogeochemical cycles. Within the SAR11 clade smaller ecotypes inhabit different ecological niches. Using metagenomic read placement onto a phylogenetic tree of RNA polymerase (rpoB), we were able to determine the distribution of different ecotypes both geographically and by depth. Our method avoids biases from the absence of quality sequenced genomes for deep SAR11 ecotypes. Depth profiles that range from the surface to the bathypelagic were analyzed at 30 stations in six ocean basins. In the euphotic zone, changes in the dominant primary producer from eukaryotic algae to cyanobacteria, did not cause the abundance of SAR11 to shift between stations. However, specific SAR11 ecotypes did correlate with eukaryotic phytoplankton (1a.3 and 1a.4) or picocyanobacteria (1b.2, 1b.4, and IIaB). In the lower euphotic and mesopelagic zones, group IIb.x was overwhelmingly the dominant species but group 1c was also present, and we found several new deep subecotypes of 1b. The shift between the surface SAR11 community, dominated by 1a and surface 1b subecotypes, and the mesopelagic ecotype groups, corresponded to the maximum decrease in the light-dependent proteorhodopsin/rpoB ratio, indicating that many deep ecotypes did not possess proteorhodopsin. This ecotype switch repeatedly corresponded to the maximum in Low Light I Prochlorococcus, leading to the hypothesis that changes in light motivates the ecotype switch. Environmentally abiotic factors like light and temperature appear to be determining factors in the SAR11 ecotype distribution throughout the global oceans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.