Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060165›Full record

ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2025

Assessment of forced spirometry quality in healthy adults at 2,700 meters above sea level

Adriana Sofía Valero-Ortiz, Myriam Rocío Wilches-Wilches, Marcela América Roa-Cubaque, Clara Lizeth Palencia-Mojica, Flor Ángela Umbacía-Salas, Alba Yanira Polanía-Robayo, Mónica Paola Quemba-Mesa, Paola Delgado-Villalba, Ángela Marcela Flechas-Robles

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adriana Sofía Valero-OrtizFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-3626-8626
Myriam Rocío Wilches-WilchesFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1490-1454
Marcela América Roa-CubaqueFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-211X
Clara Lizeth Palencia-MojicaFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-6572
Flor Ángela Umbacía-SalasFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0058-0258
Alba Yanira Polanía-RobayoFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3465-5342
Mónica Paola Quemba-MesaFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-6123
Paola Delgado-VillalbaLaboratorio de Pruebas, Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia.ORCID 0009-0009-1548-2050
Ángela Marcela Flechas-RoblesFacultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Boyacá, Tunja, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0007-5439-4390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Forced spirometry evaluates respiratory mechanics according to the 2019 American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society criteria. The quality of the test depends on the evaluation of the curves obtained according to acceptability and repeatability, in addition to environmental factors such as altitude above sea level. Objective: To determine the quality of forced spirometry tests in a healthy adult population at 2,700 meters above sea level. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective quantitative cohort study on reference values for forced spirometry in a healthy population at 2,700 meters above sea level. Test quality was evaluated using acceptability and repeatability criteria. Based on a prospective quantitative cohort study of forced spirometry reference values in a healthy respiratory population at 2,700 meters above sea level, the quality of the tests was evaluated considering the acceptability and repeatability criteria. Results: We performed 417 forced spirometry tests in a healthy adult population at 2,700 meters above sea level, 81% of which fulfilled the quality criteria. A greater proportion of tests did not meet the acceptability criteria, specifically, “the good start” item due to a time higher than 150 ms to achieve the peak expiratory flow; followed by artifacts such as glottic closure, the most frequent; and “the good end” criterion due to an early termination of exhalation. Conclusions: As the sessions progressed, the quality of the forced spirometry tests was optimized, a condition favored by the improvement of the technique and continuous training of the professionals.

Indexed as

SpirometryAdultFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultaltitudediagnostic techniques, respiratory systemprofessional trainingrespiratory function testsrespiratory mechanicsspirometry

Identifiers

PMID41060165
PMCPMC12537049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.