ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2025
Assessment of forced spirometry quality in healthy adults at 2,700 meters above sea level
Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Forced spirometry evaluates respiratory mechanics according to the 2019 American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society criteria. The quality of the test depends on the evaluation of the curves obtained according to acceptability and repeatability, in addition to environmental factors such as altitude above sea level. Objective: To determine the quality of forced spirometry tests in a healthy adult population at 2,700 meters above sea level. Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective quantitative cohort study on reference values for forced spirometry in a healthy population at 2,700 meters above sea level. Test quality was evaluated using acceptability and repeatability criteria. Based on a prospective quantitative cohort study of forced spirometry reference values in a healthy respiratory population at 2,700 meters above sea level, the quality of the tests was evaluated considering the acceptability and repeatability criteria. Results: We performed 417 forced spirometry tests in a healthy adult population at 2,700 meters above sea level, 81% of which fulfilled the quality criteria. A greater proportion of tests did not meet the acceptability criteria, specifically, “the good start” item due to a time higher than 150 ms to achieve the peak expiratory flow; followed by artifacts such as glottic closure, the most frequent; and “the good end” criterion due to an early termination of exhalation. Conclusions: As the sessions progressed, the quality of the forced spirometry tests was optimized, a condition favored by the improvement of the technique and continuous training of the professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.