Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41060154›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Dynamics of vision: Grouping takes longer than crowding.

Martina Morea, Michael H Herzog, Gregory Francis, Mauro Manassi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martina MoreaLaboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael H HerzogLaboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gregory FrancisDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Mauro ManassiSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision is often understood as a hierarchical, feedforward process, where visual processing proceeds from low-level features to high-level representations. Within tens of milliseconds, the fundamental features of the percept are established. Traditional models use this framework to explain visual crowding, where nearby elements impair target perception with minimal influence from stimulus duration. Here, we show that, at least for more complex displays, crowding involves highly dynamic processes. We determined vernier offset discrimination thresholds for different flanker configurations. In Experiment 1, for a 160-ms stimulus duration, crowding was lower for flanking Cubes/Rectangles compared to Lines, pointing toward underlying grouping processes. However, strong crowding occurred in all conditions at 20 ms, showing that grouping requires a minimum stimulus duration to occur. In Experiment 2, the crowded vernier (20 ms) was preceded by a 20-ms Cubes display. This brief preview led to uncrowding of the subsequently presented flanked vernier, but only for flankers that ungroup for longer durations (i.e., Cubes). This uncrowding effect occurred for time spans up to 1 s (Experiment 3) but could be interrupted by elements presented between the preview and the flanked vernier (Experiment 4). Our findings are well predicted by the LAMINART model, which employs recurrent segmentation processes unfolding over time to separate objects into distinct representation layers. Taken together, our novel preview effect highlights the importance of spatiotemporal grouping in crowding. In contrast to classic feedforward models, we propose that crowding is a dynamic process where multiple interpretations are modulated and gated by grouping mechanisms evolving over time.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalPattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionAdultCrowdingFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSensory ThresholdsTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41060154
PMCPMC12517361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.