ArticleJournal of vision2025
Target-flanker similarity alters the spatial profile of visual crowding.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual crowding is the disruptive effect of nearby details on the perception of a target. This influence is dependent on both spatial separation and perceived similarity between target and flanker elements. However, it is not clear how these simultaneous influences combine to produce the final "crowded" percept as flankers traverse the limits of the crowding zone. We investigated the reported appearance of a peripherally presented Landolt-C target flanked by a pair of simultaneously presented Landolt-Cs across different levels of target-flanker similarity (relative orientation), spatial separation, and target eccentricity. The distributions of errors in reported target orientation were fitted with a pooling model that simulated errors using a weighted combination of target and flanker orientation signals. The change in error distribution with target-flanker spacing (the "spatial profile") was fitted with a logistic function, estimating both the rate at which target- and flanker-signal weighting varies as target-flanker spatial separation decreases (slope) and the spatial separation at which signals were balanced (midpoint). We found that the slope of the spatial profile increases as target-flanker similarity decreases, with similar modulation patterns across target eccentricities. In contrast, spatial profile midpoints increased linearly with eccentricity, in line with Bouma's law, but were invariant of target-flanker similarity. This suggests similarity-related modulation may operate within a fixed spatial extent at each eccentricity. Investigating the spatial profile of crowding disentangles effects related to the appearance of targets and flankers (i.e., similarity) from appearance-independent influences, which can be confounded when using other common measures to define crowding zone extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.