ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Comparative Transcriptomic Profiling of Corneal Compartments Using Single-Cell and Single-Nucleus Sequencing.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Viscous DES-AAV-Foxo1 Delivery System With High Transfection Efficiency for the Treatment of Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction by Restoring Mitochondria-ER Contacts.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing (snRNA-seq) offer complementary advantages for corneal transcriptomics study. However, variations in cell-type distribution across platforms and the technical challenges in isolating corneal cells may lead to misinterpretation of biological conclusions. This study aimed to establish cell-type-specific recommendations for corneal transcriptomics. Methods: We systematically evaluated scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq performance using matched human and mouse corneal datasets. The expression of Col8a1 and Kdr was measured by immunofluorescence. Results: Compared to snRNA-seq, scRNA-seq enabled more accurate prediction of differentiation trajectory in corneal epithelial cells. Moreover, scRNA-seq captured a higher proportion of stromal keratocytes and showed elevated expression of stromal disease-associated genes, whereas snRNA-seq more effectively identified and characterized corneal endothelial cells. Conclusions: Collectively, our findings provide an objective evaluation of scRNA-seq and snRNA-seq performance across corneal cell types, offering practical guidance for selecting optimal sequencing strategies based on specific research requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.