ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2025
Reconstructing biological molecules with help from video gamers.
Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Science and Videogames: From Scientific Dissemination to Knowledge Production.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foldit is a citizen science video game in which players tackle a variety of complex biochemistry puzzles. Here, we describe a new series of puzzles in which Foldit players improve the accuracy of models in the public repository of experimental protein structure models, the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Analyzing the results of these puzzles showed that the Foldit players were able to considerably improve the deposited structures. We describe a mechanism by which the efforts of the Foldit players can be fed back into the structural biology scientific record by using Foldit results as improved input for the PDB-REDO databank. These efforts highlight the continued need for the engagement of the lay population in science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.