ReviewJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2026
Overview of Diagnostic Ultrasound Safety: Review for Research and Institutional Review Boards.
Review in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07784179 (Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Hydrocephalus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Imaging of Hydrocephalus
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acoustically driven micro/nanobubbles: from fundamental mechanisms to biomedical applications.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Electrotherapy in Pediatric Rehabilitation: A Structured Narrative Review of Clinical Applications, Treatment Parameters, Safety, and Evidence Gaps.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing the nonthermal effects of ultrasound for cancer treatment: From mechanisms to applications.Smart molecules : open access · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound is widely regarded as a safe imaging modality; however, emerging ultrasound-based techniques-such as shear wave elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-operate with varying acoustic output parameters that may approach or exceed traditional diagnostic limits. As these technologies are increasingly integrated into human research studies, Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) face the challenge of assessing their safety profiles. This article provides a comprehensive, organ-, and modality-specific review of current guidelines for ultrasound exposure parameters, including the mechanical index (MI), thermal index (TI), and acoustic intensity. Special emphasis is placed on less conventional applications, such as elastography in the eye and fetal applications, and on understanding the thermal and mechanical bioeffects associated with emerging techniques. We clarify distinctions in safety oversight and provide practical guidance to IRB members tasked with evaluating diagnostic ultrasound research protocols. Our aim is to facilitate informed decision-making and ensure patient safety while enabling innovation in ultrasound-based clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.