SynthesisSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2025
Association between the use of midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine and the incidence of delirium in elderly patients in intensive care units: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurotoxicity of ICU sedatives: we should end the surrogate debate and standardize long-term brain outcomes with a core neuro-outcome set.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Progress of nursing management for delirium in critically ill geriatric patients: a narrative review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelirium is a common and serious complication among elderly patients in intensive care units (ICUs), and is often associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The choice of sedoanalgesic may influence the incidence of delirium; however, the evidence remains unclear, particularly in the elderly population.
objectivesTo evaluate the association between the use of different sedoanalgesics and the incidence of delirium in elderly ICU patients, based on data from randomized clinical trials. DESIGN AND
settingThis systematic review was conducted using data from randomized clinical trials performed in various ICU settings.
methodsA systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases was performed in January 2024. The review included randomized clinical trials involving patients aged 60 years or older that examined the relationship between sedoanalgesics (midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine) and delirium incidence. Studies involving COVID-19 patients and non-randomized studies were excluded.
resultsA total of 1,331 patients from six studies were included. The mean age of the patients ranged from 71 to 74.7 years. Four studies compared dexmedetomidine with propofol; two found no significant difference in delirium incidence, whereas two suggested a lower incidence with dexmedetomidine. The remaining studies compared propofol with ketamine and dexmedetomidine with midazolam and showed no significant differences in the incidence of delirium.
conclusionsDexmedetomidine may be associated with a lower incidence of delirium than propofol or midazolam in elderly ICU patients. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore the factors contributing to delirium in this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024575693, available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=575693.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.