ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Scenario-Based Simulation for Pain Assessment and Control in a Postanesthesia Care Unit.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-fidelity simulation improves acute pain management competency in final-year medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveto construct, validate, and test a realistic simulation scenario for pain control in a Postanesthesia Care Unit.
methodsa methodological, cross-sectional, quantitative study, developed in an undergraduate nursing course in three phases: scenario construction; content validity; scenario testing. It was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Ceilândia, Universidade de Brasília. The Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Scale-Level Content Validity Index/Average (S-CVI/Ave) and Scale-Level Content Validity Index/Universal Agreement (S-CVI/UA) were analyzed. The exact binomial test was used to assess whether the proportion of agreement among judges was equal to or greater than 80%.
resultsa high-complexity and fidelity scenario was developed, containing the stages of pre-briefing, briefing, simulation, and debriefing. All the scenario assessment items by experts reached a CVI of 80%, a S-CVI/UA of 85% and a S-CVI/Ave of 0.98%.
conclusionthe proposed scenario was successfully constructed, validated and tested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.