Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059796›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas2025

Comparison of two treatments for dry eye disease after corneal refractive surgery.

Yiping Ma, Yukun Yang

RetractedAbstract readComparative StudyRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yiping MaDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Chengdu Aidi Eye Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5144-1814
Yukun YangDepartment of Refractive Surgery, Chengdu Aidi Eye Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-2529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are no international or Chinese guidelines for the management of dry eye disease that develops after corneal refractive surgery. Sodium hyaluronate is the first-line therapy for dry eye diseases but is not sufficient to treat severe conditions. This study aimed to compare three-month outcomes following treatment of dry eyes after corneal refractive surgery with 3% diquafosol against those with 0.1% sodium hyaluronate. In a retrospective study, 118 patients were treated with 3% diquafosol sodium six times/day (DQS cohort, n=118 eyes) and 184 patients were treated with 0.1% sodium hyaluronate four times/day (SH cohort, n=184 eyes) for three months. Before treatments (BT), the ocular surface damage score was between 5 and 9 per eye, the ocular surface disease index was between 64 and 70% per eye, and the subjective symptom questionnaire score was between 13 and 19 per eye. Wet length of Schirmer's I strip test, ocular surface damage score, ocular surface disease index, and subjective symptom questionnaire scores improved in both cohorts after 3 months of treatments (AT) compared to BT conditions (P<0.01 for all comparisons). However, improvement was greater in the DQS cohort than in the SH cohort in the AT condition (P<0.01 for all comparisons). Blurred vision, ocular discomfort, and foreign body sensations were observed in a few cases. Dry eye disease is a common complication after corneal refractive surgery, and there is a lack of international guidelines addressing its management. Three percent diquafosol showed superior improvement of dry eye parameters post-refractive surgery than 0.1% sodium hyaluronate.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesHyaluronic AcidPolyphosphatesRefractive Surgical ProceduresUracil NucleotidesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomediquafosolHyaluronic AcidOphthalmic SolutionsPolyphosphatesUracil Nucleotides

Identifiers

PMID41059796
PMCPMC12513694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.