ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026
Cardiovascular biomarkers and preeclampsia: A narrative review.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immuno-Cardiovascular Storm of Pre-Eclampsia: Cytokine-Mediated Endothelial Injury, Thrombosis, and Maternal Cardiovascular Instability.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular biomarkers and preeclampsia: A narrative review.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Long-Term Biochemical and Cardiovascular Profiles 3-6 Years After Preeclampsia: Impact of Angiogenic Imbalance During Pregnancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreeclampsia is a disorder with complex pathophysiology, which underscores the need to study various biomarkers for its early prediction, accurate diagnosis, better understanding of underlying mechanisms and potential links to other diseases. A growing body of research has explored the potential of established and emerging cardiovascular biomarkers in the context of preeclampsia. The overlap in risk factors between preeclampsia and cardiovascular disease, along with findings from numerous epidemiological studies, suggests that cardiovascular biomarkers may play a key role in predicting preeclampsia, assessing its severity and determining the long-term risk of cardiovascular disease.
aimTo explore the role of cardiovascular biomarkers in the prediction, diagnosis and management of preeclampsia, while investigating their ability to improve insights into disease mechanisms and their connection to long-term cardiovascular risk. METHODS AND DISCUSSION: This review summarizes findings from existing research on cardiovascular biomarkers in preeclampsia, including studies examining their predictive and diagnostic capabilities, their role in elucidating disease pathophysiology, and their relevance for long-term cardiovascular risk assessment. Furthermore, it highlights emerging cardiovascular biomarkers, outlining their technical limitations and the need for further studies to clarify their utility in routine clinical practice.
conclusionCardiovascular biomarkers are becoming essential for diagnosing, monitoring and predicting outcomes in preeclampsia, enabling early detection and treatment. While some are already in clinical use, emerging biomarkers show promise for more precise and individualized care. Advancing research in this area offers significant potential to improve maternal and fetal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.