ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2025
"From an HCV and HIV point of view, it's been remarkable": A qualitative study about using prescribed safer supply to support people who use drugs along the HIV and HCV prevention and treatment cascades in Ontario, Canada.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Safer supply is the thing that changes everything": the role of prescribed safer supply in rebuilding trust following experiences of medical abandonment.BMC public health · 2026Article
- "With this you're not chained down to something": contrasting experiences of opioid agonist treatment and safer supply program participation among people receiving prescribed safer supply.Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- Harm reduction vending machines as safer supply-supporting infrastructure.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Person-centred HIV prevention in an era of innovation and uncertainties.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDespite advances in HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, people who use drugs (PWUD) face significant barriers along prevention and treatment cascades. Safer supply programmes (SSPs) providing prescribed pharmaceutical alternatives to the unregulated drug supply may create opportunities for enhanced healthcare engagement and person-centred care.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative study examining four SSPs in Ontario, Canada between February and October 2021. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 52 patients and 21 providers (including physicians, registered nurse practitioners, nurses and allied health professionals). Interviews explored experiences with safer supply and HIV/HCV care. Analysis used thematic techniques guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
resultsSSPs supported HIV/HCV care by first addressing patients' substance use needs, which created subsequent opportunities for building trust for broader health engagement. Providers identified the safer supply model as giving PWUD something they wanted, which then opened opportunities to discuss HIV, HCV, and other sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections. SSPs provided opportunities to support patients with HIV and HCV testing and treatment initiation, and safer supply medications were bundled with HIV and HCV medications to support adherence. Non-punitive approaches helped overcome previous negative healthcare experiences by prioritizing patient autonomy. Implementation challenges included balancing flexible, patient-directed care with programme requirements and coordinating comprehensive services around individual needs.
conclusionsSSPs may improve HIV/HCV care delivery for PWUD by building services around their priorities and lived realities. The integration of safer supply with HIV/HCV care through daily dispensing and wraparound services showed promise for engaging people previously disconnected from care. While findings suggested improved treatment outcomes, limitations included data collection during COVID-19, limited representation of some populations and a focus on opioid-only programmes. Research examining long-term outcomes and programme sustainability is needed as SSPs face growing scrutiny and closure in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.