ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Peripheral neuromodulation in spasticity-plus syndrome: effects of pulsed radiofrequency on tonic-painful disorders in multiple sclerosis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spasticity-Plus Syndrome (SPS) in multiple sclerosis (MS) represents a cluster of symptoms including spasticity, neuropathic pain, spasms, and bladder dysfunction. These manifestations may worsen after trauma or surgery. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) offers a minimally invasive neuromodulation strategy that could complement standard treatments. Methods: We report the case of a 56-year-old woman with secondary progressive MS (EDSS 6.5) who developed SPS after hip arthroplasty. Despite multiple pharmacological therapies (baclofen, opioids, nabiximols), symptom control remained poor. Two diagnostic nerve blocks were performed, followed by PRF of the femoral and obturator articular branches. Outcomes were monitored using patient-reported measures, the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the Numerical Rating Scale. Results: PRF induced a 50-60% reduction in pain and a marked decrease in spasms, with partial improvements in sleep and quality of life. The patient rated PRF as superior to all prior treatments. Benefits were sustained for several months, supporting repeat PRF and adjunctive nerve blocks during follow-up. Discussion: This case illustrates the role of PRF in SPS management when pharmacological options are insufficient or poorly tolerated. PRF provides safe, repeatable peripheral neuromodulation without neuro-destructive effects, enabling multimodal, patient-centered care. Although based on a single case, these findings support the clinical value of the SPS construct and suggest PRF as a promising complementary strategy in MS-related disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.