ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
When the culprit lies outside the coronary artery: dual case report of coronary sinus of valsalva dissection presenting as STEMI.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Diagnostic pitfalls in localized aortic root dissection: two cases and a literature review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Located sinus of Valsalva (SOV) dissection is a rare but critical condition that presents as inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We present two cases in which computed tomography angiography (CTA) was essential in identifying SOV dissection. In the first case, CTA confirmed a localized dissection of the right SOV. Surgical revascularization was delayed owing to initial diagnostic challenges and the family's hesitation, which ultimately led to a fatal outcome. In the second, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) confirmed extrinsic compression of the right coronary artery (RCA), and following emergency stent implantation, coronary blood flow was restored, conservative treatment achieved a favorable clinical outcome. These cases highlight the pivotal role of early CTA when angiographic findings are incongruent with the clinical presentation, the utility of IVUS in determining the etiology of coronary artery occlusion, and the critical importance of timely revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.