ArticleNorthern clinics of Istanbul2025
Evaluation of area and volume changes in the costoclavicular region in patients treated nonoperatively after mid-shaft clavicle fracture.
Article in Northern clinics of Istanbul, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical considerations for costoclavicular space evaluation after midshaft clavicle fracture.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to radiologically compare area and volume changes in the costoclavicular region with the unaffected side in patients treated nonoperatively after unilateral midshaft clavicle fracture and to evaluate functional outcomes.
methodsThis study included 16 patients (14 males, 2 females) with midshaft clavicle fractures who were admitted between 2017-2018 and union was achieved with conservative methods. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the shoulder including the costoclavicular region was performed after union. Area and volume calculations of the fractured and unaffected costoclavicular region of the patients were performed on the standard MR sections under the guidance of a specialist radiologist. The Short Version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QDASH) score was used for functional assessment. Range of motion was measured on the affected and unaffected sides at the last follow-up visit.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 30.4±20.8 years (5-69) and the mean follow-up was 8.3±1.3 (6-10) months. The mean shortening was 14.3 mm±8.2 (3-29). The area measurements of the costoclavicular region were divided into 3 levels in axillary section: acromioclavicular joint, mid 1/3 of the clavicle, and sternoclavicular joint level. The median area measurements were 1115 (364-3675) mm
conclusionConservative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures did not result in significant area and volume changes in the costoclavicular region. The inability to clinically demonstrate the theoretical expectation of decreased area and volume on the fractured site suggests that other biomechanical factors are involved in the healing process of the human body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.