ArticlePeerJ2025
Reconstruction of masked sequences
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alignment-free embedding methods, which map biological sequences into a fixed-dimensional space using mathematical techniques, hold significant value in biology. A key challenge in this field is constructing an inverse mapping to recover sequences from embedded vectors. The natural vector approach uniquely provides a theoretical one-to-one correspondence between sequences and high-order natural vectors, but reconstructing sequences from lower-order vectors remains unsolved. Moreover, when sequences contain masked regions, extracting features and constructing the inverse mapping to restore the original sequence, including the masked parts, becomes even more challenging. In this article, we define incomplete information natural vectors for masked sequences and develop a long short-term memory model that achieves over 99.9% accuracy in reconstructing unmasked positions in original sequences on SARS-CoV-2 and HIV-1 datasets, while also providing predictions for masked sites that significantly outperform random prediction. Our model can robustly handle sequences with varying masked nucleotides. Overall, our approach expands the scope of alignment-free embedding methods by enabling bidirectional conversion and addressing challenges posed by incomplete information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.