Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059389›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroanatomy2025

Pioneers of modern brain research-Cécile and Oskar Vogt and the Nobel Prize.

Nils Hansson, Heiner Fangerau, Fabio De Sio, Ursula Grell, Katrin Amunts

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nils HanssonDepartment of the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heiner FangerauDepartment of the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fabio De SioDepartment of the History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ursula GrellCécile and Oskar Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Katrin AmuntsCécile and Oskar Vogt Institute for Brain Research, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article explores the complex and ultimately unsuccessful Nobel Prize trajectories of Oskar (1870-1959) and Cécile Vogt (1875-1962), as well as their ongoing scientific legacy. Their legacy sheds light on the background to the decision from different perspectives. Despite multiple nominations, the couple never received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Drawing upon archival sources from the Nobel Forum and the Vogt Archive in Düsseldorf, we reconstruct the history of their candidacies, the reasons why they were proposed, and those behind the committee's repeated rejections. Their work on cyto- and myeloarchitectonics, the functional anatomy of the basal ganglia, and structure-function relationships in the cerebral cortex earned them international recognition. However, the Nobel Committee remained unconvinced, often citing issues of scientific priority, insufficient novelty, and the controversial nature of some of their claims. Despite their exclusion from the prize, the Vogts' research shaped the development of brain science across Europe and beyond, influencing later Nobel laureates and contributing to foundational concepts in neuroanatomy and -physiology. Their case invites reflection on the historical contingencies of scientific recognition and the shifting criteria for what counts as a "discovery" worthy of the Nobel Prize.

Indexed as

brain mappingbrain researchhistory of neurosciencemyeloarchitectureresearch concepts

Identifiers

PMID41059389
PMCPMC12498338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.