ArticleJournal of rural medicine : JRM2025
Bone marrow donors: experience among adolescents and young adults.
Article in Journal of rural medicine : JRM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Recent treatment advancements have improved the survival rates of patients with hematological malignancies, making hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) a key curative option. However, despite ongoing awareness efforts, the number of bone marrow donor registrations has not significantly increased over time, possibly because of the impact of recent infectious disease outbreaks. This may affect patients requiring allogeneic HSCT. This study explored the experiences of adolescent and young adult (AYA) bone marrow donors. Patient and Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive research design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with six AYA individuals who had experience as bone marrow donors. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (022-03), and no conflicts of interest were disclosed. Results: Seven categories and 23 subcategories were identified in this analysis. Participants reported a strong sense of duty as donors, but faced challenges such as family opposition, lack of understanding from employers, and concerns about the impact on work and family life. Despite these difficulties, donors often experienced personal growth and fulfillment through donation. Conclusion: Nurses should recognize AYA bone marrow donors as a population that requires support, and consider strategies to increase the understanding and registration among this crucial demographic group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.