Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059336›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Clinical translation of human iPSC technologies: advances, safety concerns, and future directions.

Sarah Dhaiban, Sanjana Chandran, Mohammed Noshi, Abdulrahim A Sajini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Role of the Nervous System in Lung Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Blood Pharming of Red Cells.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Skin Organoids in Diabetic Chronic Wounds: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. From Pluripotency to Patients: Making Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) Therapies Safer.International journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah Dhaiban *Department of Biological Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Sanjana Chandran *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammed NoshiSheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Abdulrahim A SajiniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) have opened new possibilities in regenerative medicine, providing a versatile platform for modeling human disorders, testing pharmacological agents, and developing personalized regenerative treatments. By reprogramming adult cells into a pluripotent state, scientists can generate patient-specific cells capable of differentiating into nearly any tissue type. Using the patient's own cells allows for therapies that are both biologically matched and ethically acceptable, while also reducing the likelihood that the immune system will reject transplanted cells. Despite this promise, translating hiPSCs into routine clinical use has proven challenging, with several practical and biological barriers yet to be overcome. Key concerns include variability in differentiation outcomes, immune responses to allogeneic cells, genetic and epigenetic abnormalities, and the risk of tumor formation. Reliable scale-up under GMP conditions remains a major technical hurdle, and critical questions around long-term engraftment, tissue integration, and immune tolerance are still unresolved. Recent advances, including CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and AI-guided differentiation, are enhancing iPSC quality and enabling treatments to be tailored to individual patients. Clinical trials are ongoing in areas such as retinal disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiac conditions, and cancer immunotherapy, with early findings suggesting these therapies may be both feasible and safe. However, widespread adoption will require rigorous, long-term evaluation. This review examines the latest progress in hiPSC technology and evaluates its movement toward clinical translation. We highlight the major challenges that continue to limit broader application, particularly those related to safety, large-scale manufacturing, and regulatory oversight, and discuss emerging advances that may help bring iPSC-based therapies closer to routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

cell therapyclinical trialsgene editingHLA-matched iPSC banksinduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)personalized medicineregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID41059336
PMCPMC12498231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.