ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced acquired immune-resistant non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prognostic impact of low BMI on outcomes following definitive radiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- The efficacy and safety of radiotherapy and immunotherapy with or without anlotinib in driver gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have failed first-line immunotherapy and lack driver gene mutations face limited options for subsequent treatment. A working group recently proposed updated clinical diagnostic criteria for acquired immune resistance. Based on these criteria, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune rechallenge therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC exhibiting acquired resistance. Methods: The study involved 13 patients diagnosed with advanced immune-acquired resistance NSCLC. These patients initially exhibited a partial response to immunotherapy but experienced disease progression within six months following their last immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. Subsequently, they received ICIs again. The outcomes assessed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS1 refers to the time from the first administration of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy to PD. PFSR was defined as the duration from the first day of the second ICIs administration to disease progression, death, or the last follow-up date. OS was defined as the time from the first day of the second ICIs administration to the date of death or the last follow-up date. Results: The median age was 67 years, and 76.9% of patients were male. The disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%, with an ORR of 0%. The median PFSR was 2.90 months (95% CI, 1.97-3.83), and the median PFS1 was 5.97 months (95% CI, 4.13-7.81). Poor ECOG performance status was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR = 6.839, 95% CI: 1.557-30.032, p = 0.011).During initial ICIs treatment, the most common adverse events were fatigue (46.1%) and anemia (38.5%). Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia and neutropenia (15.4% each), leukopenia (7.8%), and fatigue (7.8%). In the ICIs rechallenge phase, anemia (38.5%) and fatigue (30.7%) remained the most frequent adverse events, with only one Grade 3-4 event reported (anemia, 7.8%). Conclusions: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who exhibit immune-acquired resistance may still derive clinical benefit from rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in those with a favorable ECOG performance status. Further prospective clinical trials and molecular investigations are necessary to validate these findings and better define the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from this therapeutic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.