Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059304›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge therapy in the treatment of advanced acquired immune-resistant non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

Jian Wang, Qijia Gao, Jianxin Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jian WangDepartment of Education, International Word, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qijia GaoChangsha Medical University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jianxin ChenDepartment of Education, International Word, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who have failed first-line immunotherapy and lack driver gene mutations face limited options for subsequent treatment. A working group recently proposed updated clinical diagnostic criteria for acquired immune resistance. Based on these criteria, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of immune rechallenge therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC exhibiting acquired resistance. Methods: The study involved 13 patients diagnosed with advanced immune-acquired resistance NSCLC. These patients initially exhibited a partial response to immunotherapy but experienced disease progression within six months following their last immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. Subsequently, they received ICIs again. The outcomes assessed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. PFS1 refers to the time from the first administration of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy to PD. PFSR was defined as the duration from the first day of the second ICIs administration to disease progression, death, or the last follow-up date. OS was defined as the time from the first day of the second ICIs administration to the date of death or the last follow-up date. Results: The median age was 67 years, and 76.9% of patients were male. The disease control rate (DCR) was 61.5%, with an ORR of 0%. The median PFSR was 2.90 months (95% CI, 1.97-3.83), and the median PFS1 was 5.97 months (95% CI, 4.13-7.81). Poor ECOG performance status was significantly associated with shorter PFS (HR = 6.839, 95% CI: 1.557-30.032, p = 0.011).During initial ICIs treatment, the most common adverse events were fatigue (46.1%) and anemia (38.5%). Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia and neutropenia (15.4% each), leukopenia (7.8%), and fatigue (7.8%). In the ICIs rechallenge phase, anemia (38.5%) and fatigue (30.7%) remained the most frequent adverse events, with only one Grade 3-4 event reported (anemia, 7.8%). Conclusions: Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who exhibit immune-acquired resistance may still derive clinical benefit from rechallenging with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly in those with a favorable ECOG performance status. Further prospective clinical trials and molecular investigations are necessary to validate these findings and better define the patient subgroups most likely to benefit from this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

adverse eventsefficacyimmune checkpoint inhibitornon-small cell lung cancerrechallenge

Identifiers

PMID41059304
PMCPMC12497850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.