ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of green tea extracts and polyphenols in female hormone-dependent cancers for benefit-risk evaluation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Female hormone-dependent cancers rely on estrogen for growth and include breast, uterine and ovarian cancers. Although preclinical studies indicate that green tea extracts and polyphenols derived from green tea exhibit anti-tumor effects without mimicking estrogen like phytoestrogens, clinical evidence remains scarce. To explore the potential of green tea products in inhibiting these cancers, we conducted a meta-analysis of preclinical data. We evaluated the effects of green tea extract (GTE), green tea polyphenol-enriched product (GTP), and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) on tumor growth indices in mouse and rat models of breast, ovarian, and uterine cancers. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (1998-2024) identified 20 studies for inclusion. Pooled analysis showed significant reductions in tumor volume (Hedge's g = -2.332, 95% CI = -3.067 to -1.596, p = 0.000) and tumor weight (Hedge's g = -2.105, 95% CI = -2.746 to -1.463, p = 0.000). Subgroup analysis revealed that GTE and EGCG reduced breast and ovarian tumors, while EGCG had no significant impact on uterine cancer. Significant heterogeneity was observed across studies. No consistent adverse effects were reported in the included studies, though liver function parameters were not assessed. These findings highlight the necessity for targeted clinical trials to assess the distinct benefits of each tea-based product for various cancer types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.