Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059275›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2025

Adalimumab around the world: comparative analysis of products characteristics and patient support systems.

Tsz Hong Yiu, Emilia Anderson, Wai Keung Leung, Hiroshi Nakase, Rupa Banerjee, Huiyu Lin, Christopher Ma, Fernando Magro, Stacy Tse, Bruce E Sands and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tsz Hong YiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The University of Sydney, Footscray, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-0739
Emilia AndersonGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wai Keung LeungDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5993-1059
Hiroshi NakaseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Chuo-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-6586
Rupa BanerjeeDepartment of Medical Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and AIG Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India.
Huiyu LinGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8779-6010
Christopher MaDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4698-9948
Fernando MagroFaculty of Medicine, The University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2634-9668
Stacy TseSusan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Clinical Center, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-0362
Bruce E SandsDr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Christian SelingerLeeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2022-5859
Rupert W LeongGastroenterology and Liver Services, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Level 1 West, Concord Hospital, 1 Hospital Road, Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5944-3488

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the expiration of the adalimumab originator patent, there has been a rapid increase in the availability and uptake of adalimumab biosimilars. While chemically and clinically similar in effects, there are substantial non-pharmacological differences in these products. This global review compares the originator versus currently available adalimumab biosimilars, focusing on variations in formulations and patient support systems across different countries. The goal is to provide prescribers with guidance on selecting the most appropriate products. Data on adalimumab biosimilars were collected from global medication registries and Product Information documents, supplemented by direct inquiries to pharmaceutical companies, with data collection completed in September 2024. Experts from nine countries assessed the local patient support system and collaborated to illustrate the diversity of adalimumab. Including the originator, there are 29 adalimumab products available globally. We highlighted products with favorable characteristics, including delivery device, concentration, citrate content, the range of dosages, latex content, and shelf life. Patient support services helped to differentiate these products further, to capture market share. Among the reviewed countries, Australia, the United States, and Canada offered the most comprehensive patient support systems, including injection training, reminders, as well as nursing and other patient support services. This review highlights the global diversity of adalimumab products, emphasizing key usability factors, such as formulation, dosing flexibility, shelf life, and patient support. A comparative table is provided to aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate option based on individual patient needs.

Indexed as

adalimumabbiological agentbiosimilarsinflammatory bowel diseasepatient support

Identifiers

PMID41059275
PMCPMC12497974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.