ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Avoidable severe morbidity from wound dehiscence after cesarean section: Practice and experience from a tertiary referral hospital in a low-income setting, Tanzania-a mixed-methods study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Readmission rate following surgical treatment for spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to determine care-related risk factors and explore the perspectives of women and care providers about complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section at a tertiary referral and university hospital. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam between April 2019 and December 2020. A case control survey compared the characteristics of interest of 131 cases of complete wound dehiscence with 393 randomly selected controls comprising cesarean deliveries between January 2015 and December 2020. In addition, six semistructured individual in-depth interviews with women, one focus group discussion with care providers, and unstructured direct observations were performed between July 2020 and December 2020. Pearson's Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used to determine the percentage difference of risk factors of complete wound dehiscence between cases and controls. Thereafter, a multivariate regression analysis determined the role of the independent risk factors. A thematic analysis was used to describe qualitative data. Results: Out of 524 women (131 cases and 393 controls), 75% of deliveries were performed by obstetric registrars and residents. Cases of complete wound dehiscence were more likely from cesarean deliveries performed by junior residents [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.4]. Wound failure was characterized by complete wound dehiscence with intact sutures (70%) on loosely binding wound margins (62%) or avulsed from the fascial layers (38%). The perspectives of women and care providers were categorized into four themes: wound dehiscence as an indicator of the quality of care; effectiveness of clinical skill transfer and team work; maternal fear, stress, and socioeconomic burden; and significant external factors influencing care. Conclusion: Complete wound dehiscence after cesarean section was highly associated with a suboptimal surgical technique, an ineffective structure and process of clinical skill transfer, and negative experience of care from patients and their families. The identified serious and preventable gaps in the quality of cesarean section stemmed from modifiable clinical and educational practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.